首页> 外文OA文献 >Application of Modified Shell Vial Culture Procedure for Arbovirus Detection
【2h】

Application of Modified Shell Vial Culture Procedure for Arbovirus Detection

机译:改进的贝壳瓶培养程序在虫媒病毒检测中的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The isolation of arboviruses from patient's low titer sera can be difficult. Here we compared the detection efficiency of Dengue (DEN), Yellow Fever (YF), Saint Louis Encephalitis (SLE), West Nile (WN), Ilheus (ILH), Group C (GC), Oropouche (ORO), Mayaro (MAY) and Venezuela Encephalitis Equine (VEE) viruses using a Modified Shell Vial Culture (MSVC) protocol to a Standard Cell Culture (SCC) protocol. First the MSVC and SCC protocols were compared using five dilutions for each of the following stock viruses: DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3, DEN-4, YF, SLE, WN, ILH, GC, ORO, MAY and VEE. Next, patients' original sera from which viruses (DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3, YF, GC, ORO, MAY and VEE) had been previously isolated were compare by the two methods using five sera dilutions. In addition, seven sera that were positive for DEN-3 by RT-PCR and negative by SCC were processed by MSVC. The MSVC protocol was consistently 1-2 logs higher virus dilution more sensitive for virus detection than the SCC protocol for all stock Flaviviruses tested (DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3, DEN-4, YF, SLE, WN and ILH). MSVC was equal to or one log more sensitive for virus detection than SCC for the stock Bunyaviruses (GC and ORO). For the stock Alphavirus MAY, MSVC was equally or one log more sensitive for virus detection than SCC, while for VEE SCC was equally or one log more sensitive for virus detection than MSVC. MSVC was consistently one to two sera dilutions more sensitive than SCC for the detection of Flaviviruses from patients' sera. Both methods were approximately equally sensitive for the detection of Bunyaviruses from patients' sera and equal or one dilution less sensitive for the detection of Alphaviruses from patients' sera. Additionally, MSVC detected DEN virus in five of seven DEN-3 RT-PCR positive, SCC negative patients' sera.
机译:从患者的低滴度血清中分离虫媒病毒可能很困难。在这里,我们比较了登革热(DEN),黄热病(YF),圣路易斯脑炎(SLE),西尼罗河(WN),伊列乌斯(ILH),C组(GC),奥罗波奇(ORO),马亚罗(MAY)的检测效率)和委内瑞拉脑炎马(VEE)病毒,使用改良的Shell Vial Culture(MSVC)协议到标准细胞培养(SCC)协议。首先,针对以下每种病毒,使用五种稀释液对MSVC和SCC协议进行比较:DEN-1,DEN-2,DEN-3,DEN-4,YF,SLE,WN,ILH,GC,ORO,MAY和VEE 。接下来,使用两种方法使用五种血清稀释液比较先前分离出患者的原始血清(DEN-1,DEN-2,DEN-3,YF,GC,ORO,MAY和VEE)。另外,通过MS-VC处理了通过RT-PCR对DEN-3阳性,对SCC阴性的7种血清。对于所有测试的黄病毒(DEN-1,DEN-2,DEN-3,DEN-4,YF,SLE,WN和ILH),MSVC协议始终具有比SCC协议高1-2个对病毒检测更高的病毒稀释度,比SCC协议更敏感)。对于普通Bunyaviruses(GC和ORO),MSVC对病毒检测的敏感性比SCC敏感或高一个对数。对于股票Alphavirus MAY,MSVC在病毒检测方面的敏感性比SCC高出一倍,而VEE SCC在病毒检测方面的敏感性高出SVC。对于检测患者血清中的黄病毒,MSVC始终比SCC敏感一到两份血清稀释液。两种方法对检测患者血清中的布尼亚病毒的灵敏度大致相同,而对检测患者血清中的α病毒的灵敏度则相等或一种稀释度较低。此外,MSVC在7例DEN-3 RT-PCR阳性,SCC阴性的患者血清中的5例中检测到DEN病毒。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号